![]() The Standard Rage Broadhead uses specialty blades with inlaid tracks, which allow them to slide about on a fixed roll pin that is centrally located within the broadhead’s body. This technology allows the Rage Broadhead’s blades to slide rearward into the fully deployed position, rather than pivoting open, as is the case with most mechanical heads. Upon its release, the Standard Rage Broadhead was often heralded as a technical breakthrough, due to its use of the company’s proprietary Slip-Cam Technology. Josh Boyd Hands-On Review Standard Rage Broadhead The following is a detailed account of my experiences with each. Over the past 15-years, I have used three different models of Rage Broadheads, including the Standard 2-Blade, Chisel-Tip, and Hypodermic. Each of these sub-models carries their own distinct features and attributes. Since this time, the company has introduced several variants of their standard broadhead, including the Chisel-Tip and Hypodermic models. How They Stack UpįeraDyne Outdoors first introduced the Rage Broadhead in 2006, at which time only a standard 2-blade and 3-blade model were available. Of these brands, I have had the most significant amount of experience with Rage Broadheads. While I certainly cannot speak as to the capabilities of every broadhead on the market, there are several particular brands that I am quite familiar with. Hands-On Review Rage Hypodermic Broadhead.Hands-On Review Chisel-Tip Rage Broadhead.Hands-On Review Standard Rage Broadhead.So far, FOCs have served me well with ~15-20 kills. The recurve will put a decreasing force on the arrow as the launch goes on. The cam'd compound will continue to keep a sustained acceleration rate that may actually increase above that initial #25 but nothing even close to the initial force delivered by the recurve. The 405 initially hits the back of the arrow with 15.6 times more force than does the Sol 390. A M405 with #290 instantly hitting the arrow is a whole lot more than a slightly faster Solution 390 with #155 and likely 80% let off instantly hitting the arrow with #25. It's the acceleration rate that can cause premature opening. They've not understood the physics of the situation. I've read many threads asking is such and such expandible xbow will prematurely open with their crossbow's speed rating. As stated by another poster, a recurve xbow has more initial acceleration than a compound xbow. If you like expandable broadheads that fly true and leave gaping wounds, the FOC is hard to beat IMO. ![]() I did a lot of testing before hunting with them last year. Racking up points wrote:A double banded NAP FOC won't pre-deploy from my MicroMax 360 or my Matrix 410 and they both draw just south of 300#. Now, if I could not be accurate with a fixed head that would be a different story. In my mind, if a fixed blade flies true, then there is no need to add the intricacies of a mechanical to the mix. The bison I shot with my RamCat left more blood on the prairie than my outfitter had ever seen. The median distance is 50 yds, with the 90th percentile being about 90yds. ![]() I may break out the dental bands and play with rages to see if i come up with something i trust.įWIW, some research I did on over 500 bow kills shows that there is no correlation between BH type (fixed or mechanical), size (cut diameter), number of blades (total cut) or anything other BH parameter and the distance a deer travels after the shot. which i know people love, and i've found fly damn near to my same point of aim as the rages out to 60 yds. I've got a bucket of slick tricks for now. I just really had liked what rages do and the wound channels they make. They are recommending switching to their hypodermic heads as they are supposed to be up for the strongest bows. Carphunter wrote:actually i did contact them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |